Drunken Theories

Brave Discussions - Discrete Flirting - Bad Poetry - Interactive Inventions - Killer Photo Sharing


Leading theorists animation
Lets work that drunken brain power
Here you might find some unique if not totally f'd up drunken theories. If you had a drunken theoretical amazing breakthrough last night and scribbled it onto some napkin, you can post it here and get feedback. Submit your drunk theory form
D
id you ever lay in bed at night and think about thinking about? I would often, and it fascinated me to think about something, .. and then think about the thinking about I was doing, ... and then thinking about the thinking about of the thinking about.... and continue to as many levels as I could until I lost my thought.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from AZ

Jump to top of page

W
e need computers to be brains and not storage units. Right now, so much redundancy in data, and so costly to identify, and re-identify, to transfer and re-transfer, to protect and re-protect to share and re-share?

We need to make computers smarter and create calculations that store data upon the landscape of the earth, and the landscape of the universe. And store information upon globally accessible elements of our landscape. The computers will identify the ideal portion or layer of a given environmental element (landscape), and the data will compliment upon the environment - in the form of equation.

Perhaps the starts may be a good storage platform - something that is static - or, who’s changes aren’t to taxing upon the calculating.

What I haven’t figured out, is what will provide global access on every side of the earth, 24 hours a day?

What element is visible to all people, all locations on earth, all the time>?




Probably some element’s sub-atomic makeup would be best. Perhaps h20 or something. Put a drop of water into your computer, grab the latest formula from a satalite, if need be, and execute the formula upon the element or atom.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet famousde from AZ

Jump to top of page

O
kay you want something new?
Did you come here to read something that startles your expectations?

Science, love, the mind, God – which topic where you hoping to find thought upon today?

Science: Transportation, energy crisis, super computers, artificial intelligence.

So are we all trying to solve the energy/transportation puzzles by thinking gas? As we search for an equal or better replacement – more abundant – less costly, if our perspective is focus on the same method of use then will we not arrive at the same fuel source to the method: gas?

Perhaps our approach should focus on new methods all together as apposed to looking for some over looked resource to fuel the same, aging methods?

Let’s look somewhere other than the current point a to point b method of relocation and transport. Perhaps oil is in fact the best fuel for such a method. Breaking it down, why is it we wish to go from point a to point b in the first place?

Some reasons we wish to go from a to b:
To get stuff we make and find to others (for trade, resource allocation and as material)
To communicate with those at location b
To learn by comparing location b with a
To collaborate
To love
To escape or cause danger

Now, what other methods to we have or can we invent to accomplish the same things?
Arrange processes nearer to the relevant materials.
Bring locations B’s information to location a instead of traveling to location B.
Use technology to facilitate communication and not waste time trying to recreate the human mind with electronics. We already have, naturally, abundant super computing human minds.
Identity why people must move away from their families and mate pool so that those reasons can be removed.
Perhaps by removing needs for consumption rather than arranging methods that require more consumption, we can lesson the need to war over resources and lesson the need to transport for war.

Sound a bit too obvious to surprise or delight you? Well read on if you dare

I do not see this list of other ways to meet our needs as a mere “Al Gore ish,” attempt to govern an improvement upon resource and fuel crisis. I am proposing the ideas as a complete solution and replacement for transportation and other costly methods of commerce and community. So, this is where surprising invention becomes relevant.

To bring the info about location b to our location a, and thus removing the need to travel to b, we need a gigantic amount of information about B and we need it light fast and real time. Same can be said about removing the need to transport to location b to perform our labor. Also, we need a method that isn’t limited by the best frame rate we can achieve – the fastest light modulation, interruption and reception: we need a more intelligent coding and decoding strategy- and this strategy needs to be sharable everywhere at once without the need for data transfer a redundant deployment.

So, I offer you the alternative to digits, wavelengths, and electricity; instead, information is archived using a “solid state” like approach, where depth will replace streams as direction would amplitudes. So, is this to say we should continue to improve solid state thumb drives until they can hold the knowledge of the world and share this knowledge everywhere instantly? Absolutely not. I am saying that we use the already engineered and infinite depths of the universe as our one shared hard drive. And, perhaps in another 1000 years, we will be micro-spec enough to see each atom as yet another infinite backup drive.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet Famousde from AZ

Jump to top of page

<
b>The Scopinator will also create portable scope galleries, dynamic slide shows, custom gif animations, Scrape pacts, Photo flirts, thumb galleries, sharable html export templates, Scope shows, zip sets, and soon the greatest photo invention of them all, "MetaPics." As outlined in an introduction thread at the forum. The first of its kind MetaPics invention will turn photos into self contained interaction archives that can internetwork to support some pretty amazing new photo-sharing possibilities. I believe the MetaPic innovation will bring photo sharing to an amazing new level.

The inaugural implementations of MetaPics are being developed in secret so that the internet companies that have stolen BDBP inventions in the past, can not steal and profit from this invention until BDBP can at least introduce the concept first.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet The DE from AZ

Jump to top of page

A
gift to all you young, super hot girls out there. This gift comes in the form of a warning. If you read this explanation and learn from it, this will be the best gift you ever receive.

Question: Why is it that hot girls ALWAYS go for total bastard asshole guys, and fucking shit all over the nice guys?

And then you girls wonder why you end up divorced, washed up, poor, and depressed in some trailer by age 30. Why don’t you fucking wise up and recognize the value of smart, kind, guys - ? Smart guys that are kind and unselfish get better with age. the assholes you think are hot, just get worse and worse and quickly rot!

I think young, hot, girls, equate "bronze" and "defiance" with potential. This, of course, is all smoke and mirrors - as you and I know. The girls eventually know, but often too late after kids lock them into their mistake forever. Selfishness and aggression only positively affect your salary if you are a professional fighter. So, to begin with, young hot girls are very very bad at identifying the precursor characteristics of success.

Secondly, aggressiveness and bad behavior are not reliable indicators of cock size. Bad treatment and disinterest shown to you by a guy, are not natural side effects of having a huge cock. If related at all, there is more likely an inverse relation between size and such behavior.

So, ironically, while the hot girls have the first and best pick of mates, it is the girls that get "second draft" picks, whom often end up with the more successful and loving husbands.

Then, adding to the irony, many of the hot girls will get divorced to the first husband after he turns out to be a looser (bad earner and bad partner) - and they re-marry a richer dude who is divorced or leaves his wife because he’s made some money and thinks he now is getting his chance to be cool and be with a "hot," tier-1 girl who is now available.

So, this "hot girl" fucks up once again, She now has chosen the second to worse choice for a mate: the second guy is almost as selfish as the first, just has more money. The good men don’t leave their fucking wives. So, the tragedy is that not only do beautiful girls make very bad choices and end up with mean, assholes for a husband: amazingly enough, they very often end up with two very bad husbands. Meanwhile, the normal looking women, especially the ones with some brains, end up happier.

It is frustrating, because a man can try and try to communicate this to a young beautiful woman, but, even being warned - they will still fall for the smoke and mirrors every time.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet everyhuman from CA

Jump to top of page

W
hat makes good art?
Perhaps a good artist.
What makes a good artist?
What makes good artists attract?
What makes attraction?
What creates magnetism?
Why do certain few people draw people in?
Why do a select few draw everybody in? Those like Elvis, like Kennedy, like that homecoming queen you went to school with that captivated everybody’s attention.

Confidence, and being oneself might be a big part of attraction.
I have a degree in acting, and with modern acting, truthful and honest behavior is almost always more interesting and engaging. There is something fascinating about watching people
that can expose themselves, lower their guards, and let their most personal, true, honest, natural and human instincts, reactions and nuances come out. Perhaps people like this are magnetic because they tell us more about ourselves, they are, more so, a reflection of who we are, than the normal quantity of feedback we receive, which is fairly watered down, distorted and/or suppressed unto us.

Think about your interactions: the more honest a person’s behavior while they are around you - the more truthful, their responses (i.e. feedback) to your actions should be; As a result, the quality of the feedback you get from such contact is very rewarding, crystallizing, - they can reflect the truth of you. Honesty allows us to trust another’s subtle assessments. Constant response-reaction exchanges construct the shape of our self-concept by providing content and opinion as subtle suggestions which are often unconscious or seemingly unperceived.

If you were alone in the universe - with no-one to reflect you, how much would you know about yourself? For all you knew, you might be a big blue snot blob and just dreaming that you had arms and legs. Being without responses, means that you have no feedback; no gauge to bounce your ideas and suspicions off of; no source to suggest into your gaps those components not thought of.

Meaning is residue. Understanding comes from the reflection of one’s thought off the minds of subjective others = cerebral assessment. (Just like white light, containing the whole spectrum of colors/wavelengths, illuminates a painting in terms of the colors that are absorbed and reflected - so does thought project upon the canvass of other minds to illuminate reality (objective truth or meaning); On a continuum, our minds register the thoughts that are reflected as truth/awareness.) - Through this sort of perceptual exchange, reality is constructed by human beings; Human beings are constructed by this perceived reality.

So, the great peace of art must offer a dependable reflection or suggestion. Honest art reveals the honest artist: when a person’s true self is presented – it helps us all build our concepts because we have so many elements confirmed. We recognized in artistic expression, elements we already recognize within ourselves. Once a thought finds an outside, independent match, we can then mark it as “confirmed.” With this in mind, it seems reasonable that we would gravitate towards sources, both human and representational, that not only produce a greater amount of confirmation, but perhaps more importantly, provide a highly accurate and trustworthy gauge – a more universal collection of self-confirmations and concept suggestions.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet everyhuman from AZ

Jump to top of page

I
f you are wondering where babes come from, it definitely is no accident. Extensive research conducted by the BDBP research team has uncovered the steps and components that produce a hot woman. You may wish to use this information to create your own babes perhaps.

Step 1. A man gets rich, or, achieves a position that insures a degree of wealth and prestige. The more wealthy - or more potentially wealthy - a man becomes prior to marriage, the more likely he is to be a part of the babe creation process.

Step 2. The man marries the hottest looking girl he can, that, meets his minimum "other qualities" requirements.

Step 3. The couple have a baby girl who will get hot genes passed from her mother. Because of her dad’s success, the baby girl will grow up well taken care of, and, have exposure to wealthier class of eligible men. Not only because of her hot genes passed on from her mother, the daughter will have a better shot than girls from non-wealthy families, at the wealthy. They will have more access to them, and, will have been raised to attract them.

Step 4. The process repeats itself, and, the daughters get more and more hot each generation, until, a daughter breaks one of the rules and breaks the chain. Once the chain is broken, it will reverse, so that each generation is uglier and less wealthy, until that downward process is, if ever, reversed.

Step 5. The most beautiful babes, our research has discovered, come forth at the 3rd or 4th cycle - most often. It can happen, rarely, that 1 or 2 babe cycles can produce a 9 or 10 babe: when this happens, it is usually do to an extreme jump in fortune within a single generation. Elvis is a good example of this phenomenon. It would probably be difficult to find any babes in Elvis’s family. Due to his extreme success, however, he skipped up to a stage 3 babe and had a babe daughter.




This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from AZ

Jump to top of page

O
k so my theory is that pine sol is the humans favorite smell because when i came home today my roommate had cleaned the house and i was like wow that smells s o good and lemon fresh. where is that fat black pine sol lady I love her.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet egg from la

Jump to top of page

I
have been working on this theory and related inventions that are necessary for it. I guess I’ll start writing about it here so if Google or McDonalds steals this invention from me, you can testify in court that you read about it here first. If this concept was to work, it would be a monumental advance or shift in the way human beings communicate and would change the nature of life more than most any invention so far. Would probably be more influential than phones, telegraph, trains, .... equal to, or greater than, the influence that electricity has had... not because of its complexity factor - in the way that Einstein’s relativity matches up, but mostly in the way that it would be such an alternative to any previous approaches to communication and internetworking, that by its mere existence and demonstration, would instantly spawn an evolution of man.... and be the very turn in our path, that sets off human evolution switching from its biological stages, to as many eons of evolution centering around our senses, our extra senses, and the ways we develop to use them for communication in ways that will make these computers, and boxed in, hard drive, data storage concepts be seen as silly as if you were to presently think of using grunts and snorts to communicate to each other - as perhaps the cave men celebrated as their state-of-the-art techniques. cont.... At internet present, we can take our laptops almost anywhere and connect to the internet, or, to particular severs and websites. But, currently, the servers – the locations and applications that house everything, are localized. This is so we can find them to make our requests for data or actions. One thing this theory would change, is this current method of localized store houses and addressed, organized components; So, we’ll work into the theory by discussing it in the context of the internet and it’s client-server architecture.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet de from AZ

Jump to top of page

L
ooking in my mirror the other day
relieved that my hair wasn’t all bald and completely grey
yet, like I had dreamt during the nightmare last night

In my reflection for a while
I think about the nightmare of the past couple years
Try to see clearly the events that did all this damage.
Reality has hosted nightmares that I never thought would come about,
outside of a fleeting night terror here and there.

Last night, sleep absorbed the yin version of my hair check episode,
left the safe, positive yang outcome for reality.

I haven’t slept much through this term of living horrors
I wonder if awake, both the yin and yang of living had to absorb.

I walk outside and see a big dead black bird
right outside the door - stiff and on it’s back with
claws straight up.

I’m wondering if this bird now sleeps away 100% of the negative
with no pain left to live through. Now, it’s all being dreamt away?

Then I wonder if the bird can only have the nightmares now,
without any of the lucid relief that waking up brings
when it gives us another chance, a better outcome.

I worry that if the bird were to have more nightmares,
he’ll never awake again to know that they aren’t real
so his nightmares will never end.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from AZ

Jump to top of page

Y
up,
and you just better hope God never decides to pop that zit!

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet cool mother fucker from AZ

Jump to top of page

<
h2>Holographic Recording and ProjectionDear Lord, May I have some money so I can fund some inventions instead of having them sit around on paper or in my head until somebody else, with more resources, re-invents them and becomes even wealthier than they already are?

How about some money to make a holographic movie projector?

Here’s how we can go about this.

Traditional still holography: The still, single plate hologram reproduces the behavior (interference activity) of light as it would normally reflect off a 3-dimensional object. Basically, we need to make light reflect differently (different colors = different wavelengths) depending on the viewers angle of site. Things appear 3D because of this parallax: because our two eyes are separated, they each view objects from a slightly different angle. Our minds can gauge the volumetric shape of an object by comparing and assessing the differences in the light waves each eye angle receives. So the trick in recording a hologram is to simulate this behavior by getting light to reflect differently depending on what angle we view the holographic surface from. When awake of light travels through a narrow slit (or grating) it will bend (change phase) to different degrees depending on the wavelength (color) and the width of the grading. The process of recording a hologram involves burning varying width gratings into a plate using a laser. The laser bounces off the object and hits the recording plate at different phases depending on its interaction with the object – which depends on the angle at which the light is directed. These gratings cause light waves to bend (diffract) in a direct relation to characteristics of the grating. Here is an example of where the science is at currently. The following experiment done recently by scientists - which is a strategy that I worked through mathematically at least 15 years ago. Instead of a monochromatic laser source being used, the experiment below uses 10 monochromatic beams of different wavelength. (traditionally a hologram is made with a single laser of one wavelength to create one recorded hologram). So, to make the hologram movie like, the wavelength of the light source projected upon the diffraction grating was cycled through each of the same wavelengths used to burn the grating. This is some progress but so far from answering many problems.

Experiment reference: Recording and reproduction of a real hologram has also been demonstrated. A small bunny figure was placed as an object in front of the cryostat which contained a 25x25 mm sized sample of chlorine in PVB. The object was rotated in 10 steps while holograms were taken at different wavelengths or electric field positions. Reconstruction was achieved by illuminating with the reference beam and addressing the proper wavelength (electric field) which resulted in a real holographic movie. A video animation is shown. Recently, a new recording method, similar to a spectrally very narrow p-jump hologram was introduced. It consists of two discrete holograms with a spectral separation of 1 hole width (2 Gh) and a phase difference of p, and was also shown to yield a very good background suppression. This method was used to record and retrieve 6000 binary data arrays while approximately 60% of the inhomogeneous absorption band was used [21]. Utilizing the full spectral range provided by chlorine in PVB as much as 12’000 images have been recorded approaching the limits given by the present experimental conditions [7].

With the experiment discussed above, several obstacles exist that prevent this process from achieving a practical holographic movie that would be effective outside the laboratory and experimental context. If separate, distinct, wavelengths are to be cycled through, then ambient white light (which contains all the wavelengths and is a sufficient light source for single image holography) would have to be suppressed. Also, I would like to see someone try to burn a diffraction grating that is the size of a movie screen. Another small problem is that a movie has a couple hundred thousand frames. The method above, which is no small task, records 10 frames. 10 frames is cool but is not exactly block buster sufficient.

So, I’d like to overcome these obstacles. First, like a regular projector does, the holographic projector will need to take advantage of optics and distance so that each frame does not have to be 50 feet wide. A special convex lens will be needed. The big key, which you may go ahead and steal so I can take you to court for your profits without having to do anything myself, is rear projection – rather that the front projection of film nor the front reflection employed by current holographic techniques. I will keep the keys relating to the light source and frame movement to myself for now.


This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet going to die from starving without money

Jump to top of page

I
nvention Drunk #47a:

Distance glasses. With or without electronics. Simplest version will have two fine gauge position setters - one on each eye. You walk 10 steps and the space (difference) between the new object side positions and the original positions can be cross referenced on a built in scaling chart. So, any distance can be judged in a matter of seconds, without electronics, by simply walking a few steps. An electronic version could have a pedometer and difference detector for greater accuracy. An electronic version could also contain pre-encoded objects with their distance - like the moon, sun, etc. The change in these over steps calculated with the already known distance and size, could be calculated against the change in the target objects dimensions or simply compared in size initially to remove the necessity for any steps. I think, though, the coolest option would be a simple set of distance glasses that worked well without the electronic option.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet poor from all my inventions sucking ass

Jump to top of page

T
he point with the bible code thoughts (started in previous post here: Chasing down the 4th dimension - while I should be chasing ass) is that those researching this, seem to find whatever they set out to look for. And. Suppose the bible code is divine in nature. I am wondering if the "divine" actually lay inside the books, intentionally positioned as text inside a limited number of pages. Perhaps the "divine" of the bible, is stored or unleashed by some that divinely look, or, by divine looking processes. The researchers develop different formulas, patterns, "matrixes" that search and process the bible's content. And they develop these formulas, in depth, until the formula produces something they recognize - which must also be something they were "looking for," right? I am not necessarily suggestion that the endeavor is not divine, and only a intricate trick of mathematics. - Necessarily. But, if their is genuine, from the soul of God, divine knowledge coming forth from the bible, perhaps the coding is related to the those looking, and the bible the perfect mirror, reflection of the looking, like this divine art. Could great art be more the lack of something than the presence of something. Could the mark of great art be related to the extent to which it can reflect truth back to the viewer and return the least amount of fiction or distortion. Perhaps it is the ambiguity, the divine balance and ambiguity, that makes the bible divine. So perfectly crafted to not mean one thing that it serves as a divine tool by reflecting everything. Like white light. Like the sun. Like love that might be open and never one defined thing, not made up, invented, pure truth of boundless reflection -- dependable truth to the given's looking. Love, 4D, divine art, Shakespeare perhaps; maybe Whitman but surely Beethoven: Is it this, and just simply this? Uncontaminated essences, exposed not created, pure truth with no invented assertions to contaminate the experience of experiences. Perhaps Beethoven lets us find what we can find, discover what our divine searches were given to look for, envision the Divine prophecies if that is the looking that one's been given to reflect upon these holy elements: elements who's divine secrets might not lie in what secrets within them lie brewing, but actually in the simplicity of what they are not doing.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from AZ

Jump to top of page

D
ear Poet Ben, I spill more beer than you drink; however, sounds like you are training hard and have some drunk poet talent - but your drunk doesn't mean shit until you write a bad drunken poem. "If a drunken stupor produces no poetry, then it was only a drunken stupor!"

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet a drunk ends up with piss from drinking. But from an artist’s drunkenness comes poetry

Jump to top of page

H
alf of you people on here arent even drunk! your coming up with bullshit to explain the human condition I however, have just brewed my own beer (40 pints 20 percent volume) =D I am not drunk yet but am having nice effect if you want to get really wrecked try to beat what I have done so far the most "out of my very mind" I have ever been was off a crate of carling to myself, 7 ecstasy pills and a shit load of dope (maruwana) lol spelt wrong JESUS LETS ALL JUST GT WRECKED AND FUCK! (too attractive opposite sex) and thus my conclusion ends rather extravagantly I must say my old chap RATHER

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet BEN from ENGLAND NEWCASTLE YOU FUCKING QUEER

Jump to top of page

T
his is my theory on why Mondays suck so much, it is because life is not ment for working, we work to live, drink and drugs clubs they all make us work so that we can afford these things ...forgot want I wads on about

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet me hi - I am a totally hot Aussi chick from sydney austrai thebest country ever

Jump to top of page

T
he best time to get drunk is between the hours of 6:30 AM and 7:30 AM. Just pour yourself a tall glass of whatever your poison is (preferably Scotch or something strong) Then, roll a joint or load a bong or pipe with marijuana. Take a drink from your wonderful glass of pleasure then after you take your drink take a hit of some weed. Repeat the process until the glass is completely empty of all booze and you have finished the joint or whatever. You will be crying and singing and enjoying your ass off in no time. Love, Brian from Keaau, Hawaii (the Big Island). P.S. Use a tall glass or drink straight from the bottle for maximum enjoyment! Life is beautiful

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet Brian from Keaau Hawaii

Jump to top of page

M
e and my friend have come up with the theory that just has to be true. Have you ever been real horney and you shave and no opportunities come up? Or if you had plans for some of these opportunities, the plans always fall through as soon as you shave. Its a curse, I swear! So if youre looking' for some lovin'...you might as well go with the all natural look...it may be embarrassing but it works every time.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet seezo from k-town, washington

Jump to top of page

<
div style=padding:21px>

Chasing down the 4th

Those that uncover what they believe is a bible code seem to find what they are looking for.  What is interesting is that when they do a query and find a good match, the words are often right next to each other. Sometimes the words have no gaps modern words that seem odd - located in such an old text.  Why do these large obvious words and couplings not stand out more until looked for? How is it that code has room for a bible code, without all of the code's answers interfering.  It seems to embody every thing and nothing.

In this way the bible reminds me of  a few divine peaces of art I've seen, and a few that I've made. Like the bible, this art is so balanced that that there  is not one mistake or unbalanced part that distracts one's perception while looking at it (or listening to it in the case of music). Yet, while absent of  a single overpowering item, works of art like this seem to reflect an endless stream of items.

agoraNot all great art is 4 dimensional, but all 4dimensional renderings are great art. What is great art? How do you know when you are seeing it? Have you ever had that feeling inside your gut when you made a certain decision, or met a certain person, where it felt like it was meant to be.  Where it feels so clear that it almost feels like dj vu? That's great art. You look at it and nothing in it's elements are misplaced or missing. And, while experiencing the art, or the song, or the person, you cannot imagine how it could nor should be changed in any way perfect truth no false moves no lies.


The only way to intentionally produce this, is by removing yourself from the process. That is why it is so rare to see the pompous create great art: it demands complete humility to be able to step out of the way and not distort what is there so you can claim responsibility. To make this art, one needs to let the divine come visible. Must apply what's there and nothing else. Much more rare than great art, is 4th dimension great art true pathways to the divine. To make the great art 4D, one must be able to paint what's there, yet balance the elements not only within a frame, but must balance all the frames, all the aggregates, all the antecedents, all the moments.


 

This is not an easy task; however, it is not as difficult as one might think either. This is where a lot of smart artists go wrong, they have such esteem of their intellect, that they try to build it themselves. This will never work transcendent art is by definition not cleverly thought up. And, the infinite, inter relation would be impossible to design without limiting.


But, developing perception to absorb the information, and, developing the energy and skills to record 4d divine, is hard enough. The way it is done, is by "breathing" dabs of life onto the vision, never painting from ones knowledge of form, never listening to those idiot college art teachers that try to sell you on the notion that art is all about sketching forms, and approaching that way art is about vision and passion and communication, not about self-centered, limited, form reproduction. Art should not reproduce anything. True art puts a sheet over the ghost. That's all


thanks for listening if you're out there


This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet de from fuck you

Jump to top of page

T
he whole world is about balance,. without bad there can be no good. good exists because of bad. example: if someone isnt drowning there cant be anyone who saves them!

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet maeverine from ireland

Jump to top of page

List of Raw Elements Apple Planet Ring Blood Necklace Table Dog Radish Carpet
Food Animals Round Colors
Apple Dog ring Red
Radish Cat Cookie Green
Ice Turtle Earring Blue
Values Apple = Food(Radish + Ice) + Round(ring + Earring + Cookie) + Colors(Red + Green)
Radish=Color(Red) + Round



Food=Food(Apple + Radish + Ice)

Entities have a value – and 3D Cartesian position based on 1. relation to every other thing 2. Degree of the relation 3. Instance of evaluation

In addition to defining items with xml and in terms of relationships like owl and the w3c seeks to do. Real connections and intelligent design must come from experience – trials. And, there must be a continuum to mark every relation.

An apple isn’t just round. One person might assert that an apple is very round, or, much less round than a ring.

So between every entity – there can be any number of relations (which could be codified several ways – including, through join collections.

For portability, different sets of relations could be referenced/applied, thus allowing infinite interfaces that can be implemented just by switching to a different relation set.

Depending on the media – Degree can be represented into several transformations, including, as a size, an amplitude, a wavelength, a volume, a number, a duration, a diffraction grating size, etc.

Item one + relates in some way + to some degree + to Item Two

From this approach, entire lexicons can be stored as a sound, or an image, or hologram.

Any entities make up and identity can be described by referencing the degrees of any direct relations and by aggregates from the item’s sub-entities



.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet de from USA

Jump to top of page

O
k, so bear with me here and first off understand that I mean NO disrespect whatsoever to any religious group, creed, individual, fanatic, or anyone else. Yes I'm atheist but I respect your beliefs so respect mine to post this. With the disclaimer over, lets get on with the beef of this matter. I happen to be a regular comic book reader, I grew up on the myths of Spider-Man, Batman and Superman. But it was my musing of Superman that I came up with this theory. This is what happens sitting in an almost-empty office the Friday before Christmas Weekend. A bit like working on Halloween and wondering if Batman celebrated it. Anywhoo I digres. The theory started off with this question: If Superman were real, were in our reality, started flying around saving us all (well the lucky populas of Metropolis mainly) and having us go 'Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it's Superguy' (cause obviously DC comics would have have sued the pants off of anyone who used the term Superman. Including pants worn on the outside of trousers) what would the human society make of it? So I mused on this but the first thing to pop into my head is that someone would claim him to be a miracle of God. Whether or not this alien (remember Superman is from Krypton, an alien planet with a red sun) knew/agreed with the concept of God I dont think I'm overly wrong in believing that someone would cry out that this was the second coming of Jesus or something very similar. I mean lets take a look at the facts. Superman can fly. If Jesus could fly then technically he could walk on water. It's all about defying gravity, the distance levitated off the gravitational pull of the ground is not up for arguement ie a plane can fly at both 2000 and 38000 ft. Superman is faster than a speeding bullet. Jesus turned water into wine- OR DID HE? Who's to say he wasnt just using his superspeed to fool them all? Supermans done it with other items. The only person who can catch him out is The Flash and mabye Hawkman. Superman is invincilbe minus Kryptonite. Jesus ressurected from the dead. The dude didnt even die, it was one big theatrical thing. Superman - Farmer. Jesus - Carpenter. Superman - Enemies trying to kill him. Jesus- Enemies trying to kill him. And lets not mention the whole 'Mary saw an "angel" and had a baby WITHOUT any form of sex'. *ahem* Is it so illogical that in a very basic time 2000 odd years ago that the population mistook an alien being for the saviour of God? I mean if I were an alien and got to a new planet and got proclaimed the son of everything they praised, I'd probably go with it too. So next time your in church, give a thought to whether this could be the greatest pre-government conspiricy ever. Jesus Was An Alien...

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet directing_dude from England!

Jump to top of page

I
saw a squirrel today on the way to work. A squirrel in central London at this time of year and I thought - well really shouldn't you be hibernating. And I mulled on this and then it struck me. We live in the 21st Century now and as such squirrels have advanced too. Long gone are the days of collecting nuts and hibernating. Now is the digital age and so Squirrels now stay in, turn on their gas central heating after insulating their trees (because lets be honest when was the last time you saw the inside of a tree in the city) and watch Sky TV. If they're running low on nuts they simply log onto the net and a small delivery squirrel arrives with next day delivery. Life is good for the squirrel and I for one am pleased for them. Long live the Digital Squirrels of The Naughties.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet directing_dude from England!

Jump to top of page

F
ood Chains

Hurricanes

Food Webs

Survival Games

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A spontaneous question linking Food Chains to Hurricanes

Outer joined onto our own social order
Always in flux
Weather shined the light lately
Part of our chain is failing.


So there are vertical food chains,
and their are the webbed,
both requiring balance
and equilibrium between
eaters - Predators and feeders.


The energy starts at the bottom
condenses into power
as it funnels
consumed up the chain
from many to few..
If one link is off,
then another misses – meals.


This happens in nature
often we make it happen
and the wolves or bears
must look for more links
must go where their food has gone
or consume another’s
Either way, inevitable confrontation
crisscrossing habitation.

Perhaps less often new channels are made
Animals more and more
Must have a flexible source
berries, a fresh kill
another’s fresh carcass they'll steal
Yet whatever the ultimate –
the resultant success of the balance be -
with these food chain adjustments,
friendly animals and friends,
get predatory.

We eat new levels of the great chain
new levels pray
and we hold on and hope
that we'll not end up consuming less
and fortifying more
when the chain is again at rest.



thanks for reading

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet de from here

Jump to top of page

<
DIV style="BORDER-RIGHT: yellow 3px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 15px; BORDER-TOP: yellow 3px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 15px; FONT-SIZE: 12px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 15px; WORD-SPACING: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: yellow 3px solid; COLOR: white; PADDING-TOP: 15px; BORDER-BOTTOM: yellow 3px solid; FONT-FAMILY: verdana,tahoma,arial; LETTER-SPACING: 1px; POSITION: relative; BACKGROUND-COLOR: darkblue; TEXT-ALIGN: left">Time to think


When you do things you hate
does time pass slowly?
Have you ever had a boring job
where you constantly looked up at the clock
and even though, between looks,
it had seemed like an hour
maybe 5 or 10 minutes had crawled by?
When you do things you love
does time fly by?
Have you ever been at a party
with a great friend or lover
and even though you were totally awake
the night flew by - in an instant
became a memory?
It is believed that any object
large enough to see cannot reach
the speed of light.

But, it has been identified
that clocks move slower
as they approach the speed of light.
So, one could say that
a faster moving clock
Will consume less time.
If you were this clock,
Wouldn't you experience
the passing of less time
compared to a relative base time?
And if you were a slow clock,
wouldn't you experience more
compared to the same relative base time?
I think consciousness is this relative base time.
And the particles that transport our thought
move at a speed very close to light
but sometimes they move slightly slower
and sometimes slightly faster.
Quantum physics suggests that,
light speed can be reached
by small enough particles.
Larger matter would take an
infinite amount of energy
to propel to light speed.
Consciousness is reflection -
being conscious of ourselves -
seeing ourselves -
being self aware.
When our clocks reach light speed,
we are perfectly reflexive and "in the moment"
when we exceed this speed,
we trap time,
we go back in time,
anti-matter is created
thus our selves can see our anti-selves
aha - reflection, self awareness.
At that boring job you had,
perhaps your mind wasn't stimulated,
your clock slowed down
bringing your speed less close
to the speed of light.
And so it makes sense that
you would experience more time
relative to the base time
kept by the clock on the wall.
When you are having a blast,
your mind gets exited.
Your clock speed accelerates
to near the speed of light,
and the more stimulated you get
the less time your mental click
will experience relative to
the clock on the wall.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet famousde from fuck you

Jump to top of page

O
nce you have drinking buddeis keep em. don;t transfer schools because if you are used to parting till five am then the friends you find at the new place will party till four (if that written at 1:30) and you will be the person posting theories online. you can drunk dial but that constricts your conversation to one of em. and no one can make it shot for shot with you when you come from a higher altitude like Colorado to flat places like Minnesota. so your options are suicide or become an alcoholic and drink alone. plus beer goggles are worse because you haven't been laid on a regular basis because you don't have that wonderful fuck buddy that you left back home that seem like the only girl that can keep up with you whiskey dick till you sober up. feel sorry for me because I am in pain.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet blaze from the university of fucking boring minnesota

Jump to top of page

O
ne might say that religion is a mental jail, or prison. But I just have one thing to say to those that believe that there is no God. What created all this, what created creation? That is God. Sin is a form of evil, which has it's hands in all beliefs and religions. Evil is the way of life that comes to one that knows the difference between right and wrong, and chooses wrong. I also call such actions as stupid. Being able to put all "boundries" or "obsticles" aside, leads to success and spiritual peace. Being able to control ones choices is the key.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet Pejamus Maximus from Salem, VA

Jump to top of page

I
left this submitted theory un-edited so you all may judge for yourself whether or not Mr. Felix has any business telling me that my theories are stupid – as well as suggesting that my theories were derived from my ass. In raw honest BDBP fashion, we shall be fair and let Mr. Felix’s submitted theory be heard. (Again, warning, this brilliant theory was not edited in any way so that the original brilliance of it won’t be lost in any translation) my argument: why bother wasting precious energy typing about some theory that was derived from your ass? I know, because you're drunk. But what is being drunk. It is a state of mind, that perpetuates that very essence of our soul, allowing us to view life threw threw a third eye....... SHUT THE FUCK UP...HAVE ANOTHER BEER, SMOKE A WHATEVER, AND STOP TRYING TO IMPRESS YOURSELF. KNOWING BIG WORDS DOESN'T MAKE YOU A SUPERSTAR.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet FELIS the fucking idiot from MEDFORD, OR

Jump to top of page

A
herd can move only as fast as it;s slowest member. When the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, we all know, kills brain cells, but naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet Jestaaranger from Bako, Cali

Jump to top of page

S
urprisingly, the key to success, has little to do with talent, intelligence, looks, money, or any other superficial or deep characteristics that apply to an individual. It has come to my attention through research and contemplation, that success is not defined rigidly in stone, but is a matter of perception and relativity. Rather than waste your precious time and energy trying to change or improve oneself to achieve success, there is a simpler more beautiful method that I have decided to reveal after long deliberation. Ladies and gentleman, the key to success is a simple matter of manipulating perception. I call my theory, motto and purpose: LOWERED EXPECTATIONS. How often have you seen a guy fawn over a girl, furiously trying to win her impress her and win her approval, while she is instead swept off her feet by the asshole, who cant remember her name, treats her like shit, but has the "sweet romantic sense" to shed a tear in apology after he hits her. Who gets complemented on dressing nicely, the suave sophisticated guy who dresses nice every day, or the slob who pulls on a pair of wrinkled khakis once a year. I can tell you assuredly its the slob. Men if you want to win a woman's heart remember this one thing: LOWERED EXPECTATIONS. If you want to get a promotion at work: LOWERED EXPECTATIONS. If you want to win your parents approval: LOWERED EXPECTATIONS. IF you want to stun an audience, impress your friends, or catch someone specials attention make sure you have prepared with LOWERED EXPECTATIONS. In closing let me summarize like this. We are not judged by what we achieve but my how much more we achieve then was expected of us.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet K from Ithaca

Jump to top of page

F
ear not ladies, you will forever look sexy in your underwear after learning this theory. The trick to look really hot in your panties, is to always wear panties that are the opposite of what the situation would predict and you viewer would expect. If you are going out to the opera and then a five star restaurant, or maybe even church, make sure to wear a really sluty hot pair of panties like a black tiny g-string etc. If you are wearing a conservative pant suit for an award you are accepting - wear something obnoxious underneath. On the other hand, if you are going out to a club wear you might meet someone, and you are dressed all sexy - wear some understated cotton panties - not some slinky g-string that screams "I want sex." Just like with movies and rollercoasters, the unexpected intrigues and thrills.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken_editor from Panty Invention Institute

Jump to top of page

P
erpetual energy is possible. Let us take two common known facts; a. cats land on their feet, b. buttered toast always lands buttered side down (I have a theory about the odds of the way toast lands being directly proportional to the cost of the carpet its falling onto but thats all conjecture) If we combine the cat & the toast by strapping the toast butter side up to the cat, and drop the cat from a small height the following will happen. The cat will hover inches from the ground and slowly revolve, effectively negating gravity. Not sure how to make use of this but hey that engineers are for. Just keep breeding the cats, feeding them the stale toast.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet DrunkenWizard from Oz

Jump to top of page

O
ne invents poems by being 100% to the core truthful instead of trying to impress, or being clouded with a bunch of academic bullshit thoughts from bullshit failed college poets. When one is truly honest with their expression, I believe, then most of what they do is invention. Why? Well what is invention? I think it is uncovering what there is to be seen and communicated truthfully. Why? Well, we didn’t (individually) make this world and universe. And I didn’t individually make this huge impulse that is my family line and brought me to be. So, my observation on how to make stuff work, or my art is not mine alone - how can I claim it. It is to me observation and communication. Just like a poem. In a great, true poem, something will be observed and communicated that is unique: A unique discovery, understanding of what is here and timeless. To matter, the poem must discover something new, uncover something. Therefore, great poetry is necessarily invention.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken_edtior from glen to glen

Jump to top of page

W
hy can’t we just measure the universe’s size by measuring the degree to which XYZ coordinates shift in relation to our relocation over a set unit of time and then compare that to the known offsets responding to movement within a smaller, known fixed dimension?

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken_editor from where the mind leads

Jump to top of page

<
b>There is no such a thing as a nothing! All things that bounce from nothing perpetuate the nothingness...

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet Sigismundo from Antarctica

Jump to top of page

I
n a nut shell, I have come up with this theory that when you drink a lot of beer, or even wine for that matter, you get drunk. Furthermore, I am postulating that the more beer you drink, the more drunken you may become. just a thought

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet pink panty poet from Long beach, CA

Jump to top of page

I
s it possible that beings, maybe some children, for a time, are excessively self-conscious or introverted = temporarily opposed to expressing themselves while they try to define what they see?

It seems that looking someone into the eye is like looking into a mirror. When you look someone into the eye you expose the momentary depth of your perception. When you talk to someone, you have to consciously hear/understand the words you are saying = you cannot, as far as I know, have a subconscious verbal communication with someone.

In this same way, you cannot let someone look into your eyes without being forced to look at what you are exposing, or, what they are perceiving (self fulfillment) The inner eye of essence, exactly like the physical human eye, can only focus on one thing at a time.

The depth/awareness a person has achieved is not entirely contained in his moment-to-moment consciousness. All humans can only focus on one thought, or, image, - however specific or abstract, = at one time. The amount of depth comes from the versatility/focus of his perception; likewise, the amount of awareness comes from the amount of "looking and being" one has done. Just like the human eye (the core of being), one’s inner self can focus on something specific or retract any degree up to the edge of his/her depth to get varying, bird’s-eye-views of the brain. But the focus is still on one thing. Moment to moment, perhaps no human is more conscious/wise/intelligent than any other. Its the strength, versatility, and, speed of this eye of consciousness, that creates varying mental capabilities within people.

Its the essence or condition of this eye that causes many quirks, traits, even, dysfunction. Is your child becoming near-sighted? Do your eyes continue to degenerate, become more near-sighted or far-sighted because your inner self stays focused too deep, or too upfront instead of exercising the whole expanse of possible depth within you? This core of the self is somehow connected with physical human vision in a way that it retains a set position directly correlating to the position of the physical when it is looking. The inner eye matches the human eye in direction and focus during active sight. Yes there are blind people. So perhaps in their case the eyes don’t parallel the vectors and distance of their inner thought. But for those who have sight, their eyes reflect an index exposing the activities of their inner vision. The images are stored and retrieved in this way with an almost infinite amount of storage space for images stored and retrieved by concentrating a specific focus in a specific direction. The focus of the inner eye can be developed and this might increase depth. The more forward the focus, the more conscious = easily retrievable the memories and thoughts will be.

back to top of page and top menu


This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

<
BIG>Depth Theory

Humans are conscious. Humans have eyes. Minds have some kind of depth that has not been quantified. Eyes control, react to, and/or reveal, depth. Depth - is a beings conscious awareness of itself. Human beings are not ashamed of the self-awareness they can understand and honestly justify. Human beings are reluctant to communicate or expose parts of their awareness that they cannot justify or understand.

There are three factors involved in the communication of a human being’s depth:
  1. The amount of self awareness(depth) the person currently possesses
  2. The amount of that awareness the being has accepted and understood enough to expose to others
  3. The degrees to which the person does or does not, intentionally or subconsciously, intellectually manipulate the communication of his/her awareness.
    • The less a person intellectually distorts or controls the truth of his/her awareness while exposing it to others = the more honest, or real, he/she will appear and be.


  4. From this suggestion of the factors contributing to a person’s communication of depth and honesty, the following state of being combinations may exist:
    1. one might, at present, posses relatively little self awareness but may expose what little he/she does consciously realize honestly, and, fairly completely = this person will look you straight in the eye because he/she is not ashamed of, or confused by, his awareness.
    2. A person might currently posses much deeper/broader self-awareness. He/she may conceal to some extent the actual boundaries/depths of his/her awareness for various reasons -
      1. he/she may not, yet, fully understand or accept what he is seeing,
      2. he may fear the vulnerability that can be felt when honestly exposing the most personal, closest to the self, region of his present conscious condition,
      3. It could be a beings intellect which steers his perception towards/into himself = the more powerful a person’s intellect, the greater his ability to convert more of his/her mind to consciousness.
        1. (He/she may or may not choose to utilize the intellect towards this goal) - If intellect is the motivator, or enabler, of self discovery, then it seems reasonable that deeper people, who by this example would generally poses heightened natural intellect, might be more prone to, or skilled at, intellectually manipulating the communication of their thoughts. By doing so, they can appear mysterious, unreal, or, possibly dishonest. The use of ones intellect seems to be the one part of the brain that can be deliberately controlled - thus, can be trained not to contaminate self-expression.(By intellect I mean the natural/original motor powering the eye of perception)

      Or, our intellect, that too often interjects and obscures truth and human honesty, can be easily be forced out of the process with lots of alcohol at a bar - as this website proposes and exemplifies -


      SO WHAT?

      "What" = These examples are attempts to explain:
      1. why some people appear more real than others,
      2. why some people appear deeper than others, and,
      3. the possibility that the more self aware a person is, the more difficulty he might have in completely communicating his awareness =


      Conclusions

      It seems that each new depth/aspect one sees within himself = must be understood and accepted before he can honestly, openly, bravely, expose it to someone else. The deeper into the mind the eye of essence peers, the closer ones consciousness is to him. The depth of the awareness a person communicates at any moment, determines the level of honesty. (Honesty = the expression of truths/expressions coming from your innermost self, the present core of your consciousness.






This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

A
) In the presents of white(regular) light, a polychromatic light source is at work - directing many individual wavelengths (colors) from which we can distinguish between and use to judge planes (distances) B) In the absence of light, or, given only a monochromatic light source, only one plane is observed. In terms of light, a plane is defined by waves of similar or identical wavelengths, which may posses varying amplitudes. A form in a given plane is perceived from an ordered variance in amplitude. From this: (1) Planes (depths) are created with hue, and, (2) individual planes, can be organized to equal one overall plane, where the hues (wavelengths/color) of each little plain combine to project the spectrum of the greater plane, and the averaged amplitudes of the sub-planes contrast each other to convey an overall form embedded into the overall plane.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

-
By varying the light source, or perspective, a spectator can move through the painting from one plane to the next, or to a greater plane (macro-plane) - its values being its subordinate planes. This construction can theoretically be repeated infinitely, adding a fourth dimension (or more) to the 3d concept of perception, in order to construct, record, and convey perception in a mental context

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

-
In this mass society, spectators have different capacities and perspectives with which to extract meaning from art. As a result, the meaning people receive will vary qualitatively and quantitatively. With Actualism, all spectators will receive the same thing - the objectivity of action, regardless of their ability and means to describe it.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

M
eaning is residue. Understanding comes from the reflection of one’s thought off the minds of subjective others = cerebral assessment. (Just like white light, containing the whole spectrum of colors/wavelengths, illuminates a painting in terms of the colors that are absorbed and reflected - so does thought project upon the canvass of other minds to illuminate reality (objective truth or meaning); On a continuum, our minds register the thoughts that are reflected as truth/awareness.) - Through this sort of perceptual exchange, reality is constructed by human beings; thus, meaning is not a real entity, but a human construction, or explanation, of an entity. I paint the actual entities that meaning is mortally constructed to explain. Thus, I call my art Actualism.

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page

1
. A work of art’s meaning exists mainly in relation to the viewer/spectator; therefore, a piece of art, no matter how intentional, might have no meaning other than that assigned to it by the spectator. To make immortal pieces of art that are universally effective, I record action rather than meaning. Action in painting, as in Theatre, is indisputable. That is to say, I record the action (my action) of receiving meaning = imagination/creation. In these actions - mental experiences, lie the raw, universal, components of feeling, understanding, and, awareness (reflection). Meaning is residue. Understanding comes from the reflection of one’s thought off the minds of subjective others = cerebral assessment. (Just like white light, containing the whole spectrum of colors/wavelengths, illuminates a painting in terms of the colors that

This brilliant theory submitted by drunk poet drunken editor from bars

Jump to top of page



My Stuff
Main Areas
Special Features
Help & Inofrmation